One by one sovereign nations declared lockdown: shutting up borders, bordering up shops, schools and churches, banning public gatherings, and “advising” citizens to stay at home unless “essential” – threatening hefty fines and jail terms for non-compliance. Simply leaving one’s house (which most people don’t even own) became a criminal offence, except when deemed to be absolutely necessary. Though evictions were briefly frozen, rents have continued to pile up, despite millions losing their livelihoods due to the forced closure of businesses and being effectively placed under house arrest. How those already struggling to make ends meet will catch up on paying rent and mortgages remains an unanswered question. As does how it’s possible for any small businesses to run in an economy that’s paused and restarted at the whim of unelected health authorities. “Disease spreaders” venturing out into the apocalyptic scenes depicted on the 24 hour rolling news have been diligently snitched on by curtain twitching neighbours and shamed by tabloid journalists, bucking society’s new moral trend. Pointing finger wagging towards wage-to-wage workers, forced to brave an apparently deadly and highly contagious virus consuming the world, the “invisible enemy.”
The science behind viruses is originally derived from the germ and contagion theories of disease. It was updated by Marcus von Plenciz in 1762 but invented earlier in a 1546 book called De Contagionibus Et Contagiosis Morbis, written by the Venetian Girolamo Fracastoro, who was educated at Padua and elected as physician of the Council of Trent. Theories further expanded upon in 1646 in a Latin work by the Jesuit scholar and polymath Athanasius Kircher. After investigations on Antonie van Leeuwenhoek’s newly invented light microscope, Kircher witnessed “worms” secreting from decaying bodies of meat and milk, leading him to assert that disease and putrefaction (decay) is caused by the presence of invisible living bodies. Upon discovering similar “little worms” or “animalcules” (the name given by Leeuwenhoek to bacteria seen under optical microscopes) in the blood of patients struck during Rome’s 1656 bubonic plague, Kircher concluded that disease was caused by microorganisms. Becoming the first person to link infectious diseases to a microscopic pathogen, outlining his germ contagion theory of disease in Scrutinium Pestis Physico-Medicum (Rome 1658). As it turns out, what he saw under his microscope was in actuality red or white blood cells, not a plague agent. It was Kircher who proposed many of the hygienic measures adopted to prevent the spread of contagious disease, such as self-isolation, quarantining, burning of clothes worn by the infected, and wearing of face-masks.
It took up until the last century’s invention of an electron microscope before the existence of viruses could be visually portrayed. Equating to small black blobs of pixels, often mistaken for other genetic debris, requiring microscopic specialists to analyse. Set out in 1890, the gold standard used by virologists to determine the microbial cause of infectious diseases is Koch’s postulates, stating: “1) The microorganism must be found in abundance in all organisms suffering from the disease, but should not be found in healthy organisms. 2) The microorganism must be isolated from a diseased organism and grown in pure culture. 3) The cultured microorganism should cause disease when introduced into a healthy organism. 4) The microorganism must be reisolated from the inoculated diseased experimental host and identified as being identical to the original specific causative agent.” Essentially, from a group diagnosed with similar symptoms, the same diseased organism (i.e. the blood or respiratory secretions) should be found, from which a pure culture is grown, and injected into a susceptible animal for infection, so its diseased organism can then be cultured out of them. Dr Thomas Cowan gives the example of the chickenpox: when, typically, children experience low-grade fever, sickness, and a vesicular rash, causing blister bubbles, the fluid from which under a microscope shows thousands to millions of copies of the chickenpox virus, also contained in most abundance within the infected blood (a condition called viremia, similar to bacteremia); contrasted to healthy blood which harbours no bacteria or viruses. It’s a pure culture of the chickenpox virus, not existing to any such extent within normal healthy people.
In the case of SARS-CoV-2 (dubbed COVID-19), a purported novel mutation of coronavirus (the technical term for common-flu), there is no evidence that Koch’s postulates have ever been fulfilled and that the virus has been purified (or isolated). Instead, smears of electron microscopy (EM) examinations were provided from the lung fluid of patients, showing cellular debris, a number of which appear like viruses, one of which was classified as COVID-19. This is entirely different to fulfilling Koch’s postulates and demonstrating millions of copies of the virus in the sputum and blood, as experienced by other viruses such as chickenpox or meningococcal. The EM examination didn’t even utilise its full capability and employ a magnification level of 500x normal. Rather, in Wuhan China in December 2019, after examining patients from the viral outbreak source, scientists genetically sequenced coronavirus material as RNA instead of DNA, said by virologists to have been previously unseen, leading them to conclude that it must be the cause of this sudden sickness. Dr Cowan reckons: “this flies in the face of everything we know about virology and infectious causation, and I would also point out this is not the first time this has happened – and in fact – it happens every time.” He went on to cite a polio outbreak example from the late 1800’s: occurring at the same time orchids and apple trees were sprayed with lead arsenic and later Dithiothreaitol (DTT), both specific poisons now known to affect the anterior horn cells of the nervous system, the pathological area of the body in polio. People began contracting symptoms of acute paralysis that was eventually to be termed polio. Virologists without access to electron microscopes or any visibility of viruses, had to use other methods to try and prove their infectious ideology. First, they extracted the diseased spinal chords and brain tissue of dead paralysed children, then blended this material up without any purification, and gave it as a drink to monkeys, but they never got sick. Unable to make any animals sick, they moved onto subcutaneous injection (a shot inserted into the fat layer between the skin and muscle) into the monkeys arms, but still none got sick. Determined to offer some evidence, researchers resorted to drilling holes into two monkeys skulls, and then inseminated a quarter cup of spinal chord fluid goop through these skull holes into the brain; one monkey died and the other was paralysed, which was pictured held up as proof by a proud researcher. Dr Cowan notes that this blatant failure of evidence was also the case in relation to the 2009 H1N1 virus (swine flu) epidemic; the H5N1 virus (influenza) detected since 1996; the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) surfacing in the early 2000’s; the hepatitis C virus (HCV) of 1988; the Ebola virus disease (EVD) identified in 1976; and the Zika virus (ZIKV) appearing in 1947.
Dr Cowan asserts that the procedure which should’ve been carried out for coronavirus was to round up a sample of 500 people suffering from its symptoms (a vague low-grade fever and dry cough, also experienced by those with bronchitis, asthma, air pollution, etc., showing up as a shadow on the lungs in a CT scan) for an electron microscopy examination of their sputum and blood, to observe millions of copies the virus, and characterise it. 100% of this first group should have millions of copies of the virus in their sputum or blood, which can then be weighed against a control group of another 500 healthy people, who shouldn’t. At that point Dr Cowan states that the procedure would be to purify (filter) those millions of copies the virus, and infect it into a susceptible animal (either by injection or squirting it up the nose or down the throat); if all these animals begin showing millions of copies of the virus in their sputum and blood, against a control group given some saline solution that doesn’t develop the virus, then the virus is proven to exist.
The modern test technique cited to be in use for diagnosing coronavirus as the cause of disease is called reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), aka, a viral load test. A combination of reverse transcription of RNA into DNA (in this context referred to as complementary DNA or cDNA) and amplification of specific DNA targets through polymerase chain reaction (PCR). This viral load surrogate test is a theoretical estimation of microbial activity, developed by the Nobel Prize winning Kary Mullis to detect HIV. He recognised limitations and specifically contradicted its current usage by stating: “Quantitative PCR is an oxymoron. PCR is intended to identify substances qualitatively, but by its very nature is unsuited for estimating numbers. Although there is a common misimpression that the viral-load tests actually count the number of viruses in the blood, these tests cannot detect free, infectious viruses at all; they can only detect proteins that are believed, in some cases wrongly, to be unique to HIV.” “The tests can detect genetic sequences of viruses, but not viruses themselves.” The PCR test simply amplifies the genetic sequences of a viral fragment millions of times, it does not demonstrate viremia, or fulfil Koch’s principles by isolating any particular viruses, nor even conclusively identify or detect any virus. Surrogate data testing is performed by a best assessment of available information and can only be a gold standard test (a diagnostic test benchmark) with necessarily correct assumptions. In the case of chickenpox and meningococcal for example, Koch’s postulates are considered by the mainstream medical industry to be accurate 100% of the time. A reliance on the PCR test in diagnosing this claimed novel mutation of coronavirus (aka 2019-nCoV, re-branded as COVID-19), even according to the inventor of the test, is not definitive evidence of any viral infections. During PCR tests, unique genetic sequences are stimulated to create copies, which multiply with each cycle; after 36 cycles there is the colour change that designates the genetic material as positive for coronavirus, although there will still be false positives (an indeterminable amount without comparable data); when it’s carried out 37 times and seen for example 5% of the time within patients suffering related symptoms, then that output is relayed as the final result. However, if 40 – 60 amplification cycles are carried out, lots more sequence samples start testing positive, eventually ending up at 100%, proving that somewhere within everybody’s physiological secretions is a piece of COVID-19 RNA. Confusion further arises due to each country using its own standard number of magnification cycles, a figure they may decide to alter during an epidemic, and by that factor alone dramatically increase or reduce the percentage of total infections. Potentially skewing statistical results, and enabling intentional manipulation in the promotion or dismissal of specific cures. Dr Cowan says: “All biological tests have false positives: so if you test 30 million people and you have a 1% false positive rate, then 300,000 people, by definition, will test positive, and then you have an epidemic.” “And then if you want to demonstrate that the epidemic got better, all you have to do is lower the magnification examples to 35, and then suddenly your vitamin C or vaccine or your chloroquine or whatever you did, worked! And now there’s no more people testing positive.”
Excess mortality rates, epidemiological data recorded by public health authorities, week by week, month by month, and tracked over a large quantity of years, never substantially increased up until the lockdown began. Whether it’s set to get worse or has been correctly reported remains to be seen. Compared with the previous five years, excess mortality rates remained similar, indicating no epidemic; holding true until lockdowns were introduced, the consequences of which admittedly caused many additional deaths, unrelated to any virus. Catastrophic predictions were widely forecast this century for many other viruses that never came to fruition. Herbert W. “Skip” Virgin, one of the world’s top virologists, describes a virus as a piece of genetic material, that’s either RNA or DNA (and sometimes containing other proteins), with a capsule constructed out of the cell membrane of the host cell. The human virome (similar to the microbiome) is defined as a body’s complete collection of viruses, but essentially each person’s cellular structure stores within it all possible pieces of RNA and DNA genetic sequences (proved by the highest magnification cycles of PCR tests), prompting new theories to emerge as to how it functions. One such being that if a cell is poisoned, causing degradation of its genetic material, either RNA or DNA, “it will cause the production of billions of copies of this poisoned DNA. And the body will package that up and it will become as if it’s a messenger sent by the poisoned cell to the other cells, the other tissues, even the other people around it, and maybe even to other species.” “In other words: we know these so-called viruses are not free living, they emerge from within your cell, and we think they emerge when you have broken DNA. So essentially, the question here is, is this coming from inside because your poisoned, or is this an actual infection coming from outside? Or, it’s also possible that it could be both, or either one in different situations. But we also know that, this is becoming more and more accepted, it’s called exosome theory: where the body is poisoned, it generates these viral particles, these pieces of DNA which it encapsulates; it sends them as a messenger to the other members of the species, to the other cells, even to beings of other species, saying there’s a new danger in town, you should defend yourself. This, interestingly, is what trees do: because if you get a beetle infestation of a tree in a forest that tree makes messengers. They’re not exactly like viruses because they’re not pieces of the genetic material, but they’re chemical hormonal messengers, which are then secreted by the roots of the tree. It’s picked up by the other trees, and the other trees make an immunological reaction to defend themselves against this new attack.” Rudolf Steiner, a philosopher and mystic who was Jesuit educated, also “described that these viruses were actually poisons or messengers secreted by your cell to have an affect on the world, telling the world there’s some new danger afoot.” Many people getting sick within a specific area doesn’t absolutely prove contagion, there are many other causes (warfare, malnourishment, harmful levels of pollution, etc.). The main preventions for disease epidemics are sanitary. First consisting of a clean water supply, proper hygiene measures, and high standards of living. Toxic poisoning of a species water or food source is the most common cause of non-contagious sickness outbreaks. Dr Cowan gives a modern example of a new car using bio-fuel that burns genetically modified (GMO) corn, a crop heavily covered in the carcinogenic and genetically degrading glyphosate herbicide, to illustrate how its exhaust emissions could act like an externally novel airborne virus by being “packaged up by the cells”. Mass vaccinations, many of which contain heavy metals such as aluminium and mercury, were administered in both Wuhan China and Northern Italy (two of the first and worst hit areas) in the year leading up to the coronavirus outbreak. Vaccines are always another potential source of non-contagious sickness outbreaks, with a long history of neurotoxic and genotoxic effects. Geoengineering programs could even be another source of air pollution, releasing toxic metals into the atmosphere; such initiatives are now openly discussed at the world’s top universities, framed as battling solar activity, claimed to exacerbate CO2 emissions and climate change. Dr Cowan also points out that the coronavirus symptoms experienced (“a degradation of DNA or RNA in this case, poor lung function, and trauma to the lungs causing bleeding and other symptoms of dry cough”) are negative effects that might be expected to be caused by an overload of radio signals, and this coronavirus outbreak has coincided with the international roll-out of 5G technology. Again, Wuhan was the first city in the world to roll-out this technology, and Northern Italy was the first European area. Obviously there have been reported outbreaks in areas without this technology as well, so there must be other factors at play, foremostly the accuracy of testing and recording methods. Dr Cowan also mentioned a recently released book called The Invisible Rainbow: A History of Electricity and Life, by author Arthur Firstenburg. A current bestseller in its category on online book outlets. Claiming that there is a correlation between the roll-out of new electrical and wireless technologies and past epidemics and increases in diseases and environmental problems. Even connecting the 1889 mass roll-out of alternating current electricity to the beginning of influenza, which climaxed in 1918 during Marconi’s first radio wave transmissions, and peaked again after radar’s launch in 1957 and 1958. Of course, correlation does not prove causation, there were many other factors involved in the spread of influenza, not least of all compulsory vaccinations in many countries. Firstenburg has also expressed warnings over 5G technology. Necessitating the roll-out of millions of ground based broadcast towers around the world (800,000 in the US). Hundreds to thousands spread out in a close proximity range in locations with coverage (100 metres apart in cities, up to 200 metres elsewhere).
5G stands for 5th generation wireless communications technology, that in its most advanced version, is capable of harnessing an extremely high frequency (EHF) band (between 30 GHz – 300 GHz), producing millimetre waves. In addition to microwaves used by previous generations of cellular technologies, from 2G – 4G. It also employs the new technologies of active antennas used for beamforming, phased arrays, and massive MIMO (multiple inputs and outputs), presenting “unique challenges for measuring exposures.” However, the Federal Communications Commision (FCC) reaffirmed its radio frequency radiation (RFR) exposure limits adopted in the late 1990’s. “These limits are based upon a behavioral change in rats exposed to microwave radiation and were designed to protect us from short-term heating risks due to RFR exposure. Yet, since the FCC adopted these limits based largely on research from the 1980s, the preponderance of peer-reviewed research, more than 500 studies, have found harmful biologic or health effects from exposure to RFR at intensities too low to cause significant heating. Citing this large body of research, more than 240 scientists who have published peer-reviewed research on the biologic and health effects of nonionizing electromagnetic fields (EMF) signed the International EMF Scientist Appeal, which calls for stronger exposure limits. The appeal makes the following assertions: ‘Numerous recent scientific publications have shown that EMF affects living organisms at levels well below most international and national guidelines. Effects include increased cancer risk, cellular stress, increase in harmful free radicals, genetic damages, structural and functional changes of the reproductive system, learning and memory deficits, neurological disorders, and negative impacts on general well-being in humans. Damage goes well beyond the human race, as there is growing evidence of harmful effects to both plant and animal life.’ The scientists who signed this appeal arguably constitute the majority of experts on the effects of nonionizing radiation. They have published more than 2,000 papers and letters on EMF in professional journals. The FCC’s RFR exposure limits regulate the intensity of exposure, taking into account the frequency of the carrier waves, but ignore the signaling properties of the RFR. Along with the patterning and duration of exposures, certain characteristics of the signal (e.g., pulsing, polarization) increase the biologic and health impacts of the exposure. New exposure limits are needed which account for these differential effects. Moreover, these limits should be based on a biological effect, not a change in a laboratory rat’s behavior. The World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified RFR as “possibly carcinogenic to humans” in 2011. Last year, a $30 million study conducted by the U.S. National Toxicology Program (NTP) found “clear evidence” that two years of exposure to cell phone RFR increased cancer in male rats and damaged DNA in rats and mice of both sexes. The Ramazzini Institute in Italy replicated the key finding of the NTP using a different carrier frequency and much weaker exposure to cell phone radiation over the life of the rats.” “Millimeter waves are mostly absorbed within a few millimeters of human skin and in the surface layers of the cornea. Short-term exposure can have adverse physiological effects in the peripheral nervous system, the immune system and the cardiovascular system. The research suggests that long-term exposure may pose health risks to the skin (e.g., melanoma), the eyes (e.g., ocular melanoma) and the testes (e.g., sterility). Since 5G is a new technology, there is no research on health effects, so we are “flying blind” to quote a U.S. senator. However, we have considerable evidence about the harmful effects of 2G and 3G. Little is known the effects of exposure to 4G, a 10-year-old technology, because governments have been remiss in funding this research. Meanwhile, we are seeing increases in certain types of head and neck tumors in tumor registries, which may be at least partially attributable to the proliferation of cell phone radiation. These increases are consistent with results from case-control studies of tumor risk in heavy cell phone users. 5G will not replace 4G; it will accompany 4G for the near future and possibly over the long term. If there are synergistic effects from simultaneous exposures to multiple types of RFR, our overall risk of harm from RFR may increase substantially. Cancer is not the only risk as there is considerable evidence that RFR causes neurological disorders and reproductive harm, likely due to oxidative stress.” – Joel M. Moskowitz, PhD, director of the Center for Family and Community Health in the School of Public Health at the University of California, Berkeley.
There is a long history of studies into the negative effects of electromagnetic fields from radio and microwave technologies. An “In-House Report” compiled in 1994 by the Rome Laboratory, the US “Air Force ‘superlab’ for command, control, and communications,” covered these risks in depth; It was titled, Radiofrequency/Microwave Radiation Biological Effects and Safety Standards: A Review, and concluded that: “Exposure to RF/MW radiation is known to have a biological effect on living organisms. Research conducted over the past 30 years has provided a basis for understanding the effect of irradiation of biological materials. Experimental evidence has shown that exposure to low intensity radiation can have a profound effect on biological processes. The nonthermal effects of RF/MW radiation exposure are becoming important measures of biological interaction with EM fields. Modem RF/MW radiation protection guides have sought to account for the effects of low level radiation exposure. Adherence to the ANSI Standard  should provide protection against harmful thermal effects and help to minimize the interaction of EM fields with the biological processes of the human body . It is essentially the absorption of RF/MW energy that causes stress and trauma to biological systems. The greatest amount of energy will be absorbed when the incident radiation is emitted at the resonance frequency of biological material , . In this regard, RF/MW radiation emitted at nonresonant frequencies should be absorbed to the greatest extent when the radiating mode is a pulsed signal. The generation of such signals creates transient responses that will match the resonant frequencies of biological materials. Nonresonant pulsed RF/MW radiation may be more harmful to living organisms than CW radiation emitted at nonresonant frequencies.” A report produced in 1993 by the Science Applications International Corporation, called The Effects of Electromagnetic Radiation on Biological Systems: Current Status in the Former Soviet Union, studied the effects of both extremely low frequency (ELF) fields and microwave (millimetre waves): “At present a significant body of evidence has been collected on the ability of microwaves in the milimetre range to bring about biological effects including those on a cellular level [1, 2]. It has been found that microwaves can influence the processes of gene expression [3 – 5]. The specific features of such interaction are dependence on frequency and also effectiveness of low intensity microwave radiation which does not result in significant heating of the irradiated object. One possible explanations of these facts accounts for the influence of milimeter waves on the genome conformational state . The genome conformational state (GCS) is expressed as the space topological organization of the entire chromosomal DNA, which is ensured, among other things, by the supercoiling of DNA and DNA protein bonds. The GCS changes play a significant role in all elementary genetic processes – transcription, replication, repair. The hypothesis which accounts for the influence of milimeter radiation most evident in the case of stressed systems [1, 7] among them bioobjects subjected to ionizing radiation  has repeatedly been verified.” One related report released in 1977 by the Khar‘kov Scientific Research Institute of Microbiology, Vaccines and Sera imeni Mechnikov, titled, Biological Effect of Milimeter Radiowaves, summarised that: “Morphological, functional and biochemical studies conducted in humans and animals revealed that milimeter waves caused changes in the body manifested in structural alterations in the skin and internal organs, qualitative and quantitative changes of the blood and bone marrow composition and changes of the conditioned reflex activity, tissue respiration, activity of enzymes participating in the processes of tissue respiration and nucleic metabolism. The degree of unfavourable effect of milimeter waves depended on the duration of radiation and individual characteristics of the organism.” Another 1976 report, titled, A Modulated Electromagnetic Field As A Factor Of Selective Influence Upon The Mechanisms Of Goal-Oriented Behaviour In Animals, from the Moscow Zhurnal Vysshey Nervnoy Deyatel’Nosti, purports to support abilities pertaining to behavioural changes and negative psychological mood impacts, finding that they could prevent rats from attempting to retrieve food by using specific EMF signals, or stop them from bothering to eat at all any longer, if continually exposed to this EMF radiation.
This EHF band, specifically at near 95 GHz (a wavelength of 3.2 mm), is acknowledged by the military to be used in its reported Active Denial Systems (ADS) technologies; designed to “heat” the outer layer of the body using electromagnetic millimetre waves, by beaming a focused signal towards targets within a specific geographical area. A “microwave oven” effect, produced by 30,000 kW – 100,000 kW and above of power, depending on the distance required (measuring 250 metres – 1,000 metres at these power outputs). Vibrating water particles and heating them into steam, effectively cooking its target. The beam is 2 metres wide and the 95 GHz frequency has a penetration depth in human skin of 0.4 mm, said to cause a target to experience unbearable pain within seconds. On its highest power setting inflicting second to third degree burns and dermal necrosis in 2 seconds. Potentially doing the same at a lower setting if triggered for a longer duration. It’s claimed however not to directly affect internal organs. “Millimeter-wave radiation of 100 kW maximum power is produced by a gyrotron tube with a superconducting magnet of 3.7 Tesla, cooled by a cryo-refrigerator.” – Millietre Waves, Lasers, Acoustics for Non-Lethal Weapons? Physics Analyses and Inferences. The methods used to test the biological effects of millimetre waves in skin dosimetry evaluate the absorption and penetration depth in the epidermis and dermis. The characteristics of the calculations rely upon “reflection, power density (PD), penetration depth (delta), and specific absorption rate (SAR).” – Millimeter Wave Dosimetry of Human Skin. A similar effect to ADS is noticed by maintenance engineers if stood directly in front of active cell site antennas, who complain of headaches and nausea. These associations with 5G, combined with an apparent new disease outbreak with relatable symptoms, have a lot of the general public and commentators concerned it could be used as a directed-energy weapon (DEW). Safety concerns are meant to be alleviated by the power levels 5G generates: a typical 5G cell site’s overall power consumption from the grid’s supply being about 15 kW, with radiation from each antenna array only reaching around 120 watts – 140 watts. Fears persist however due to studies into the ill-effects of previous generations of cell technologies and the untested nature of 5G’s radiation effects, elevated by its ability to perform beamforming and directional signal transmission or reception, which can be combined with signal triangulation. Previous generations of wireless communications technology never used the EHF band and are almost all limited to an omni-directional range.
The military applications of DEWs date back to the legend of the Mirrors of Archimedes; an ingenious ploy to use a mirror with an adjustable focal length, or series of mirrors focused on a common point, to direct sunlight towards invading ships and set them on fire. An experiment by MIT showed that such an idea was at least possible. Robert Watson-Watt of the Radio Research Station was tasked by the British Air Ministry in 1935 to study the feasibility of a “death ray.” He concluded that it wasn’t possible… but advised on the use of radio to detect aircrafts, spearheading the development of radar in Britain. A fictional “engine-stopping ray” was devised by British Intelligence during the war as a means of tying up the resources of Germany’s scientific researchers. During WW2 the Axis engineers allegedly developed a sonic cannon that could cause fatal vibrations in target bodies. Using a methane gas combustion chamber, fed to two parabolic dishes pulse-detonated at roughly 44 Hz. A sound magnified by its dish reflectors, causing vertigo and nausea at 200 – 400 metres by vibrating the middle ear bones and shaking cochlear fluid inside the inner ear. At 50 – 200 metres distance, acting on organ tissues and fluids, repeatedly compressing and releasing compressive resistant organs (the kidneys, spleen and liver). Affecting lung tissue only at close range. The Nazi party became fascinated with “wonder weapons,” attempting to use X-ray synchroton (a cyclic particle accelerator) beams as weapons, such as the Siemens-Schuckert developed Rehotron, a transformer with a torus-shaped secondary coil, later called a Betatron. The purpose of this reputedly failed prototype was to pre-ionise an aircraft’s ignition to serve as an anti-aircraft DEW. Vladimir Gavreau’s innovations in instantly deadly sonic weapons have also been written-off as mythical by subsequent researchers attempting to replicate his work. The USA reportedly used DEWs during the Iraq war to disrupt and disable electronics equipment and is accused of deploying ADS for crowd control. Commonly listed bio-effects of “non-lethal” DEWs include: “Difficulty breathing; Disorientation; Nausea; Pain; Vertigo; Other systemic discomfort.” Military and cruise ships use Long Range Acoustic Device (LRAD) sonic weapons to ward off pirates. Today it’s the European Space Agency that claims to posses a killer sonic weapon. which by generating 154 dB using four large acoustic orifices (or horns) and using nitrogen gas, is able to burst eardrums, and at 185 – 200 dB purports to be capable of causing an air embolism in the lungs, before travelling to the heart and exploding it. Alternatively bursting the lungs due to the increased air pressure (acoustic waves increase in pressure the higher the energy and thus sound). Subject to frequency, amplitude and duration. The American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine (AIUM) maintains that there’s “no proven biological effects associated with an unfocused sound beam with intensities below 100 mW/cm² SPTA [spatial peak temporal average] or focused sound beams below an intensity level of 1 mW/cm² SPTA.”
Sonic weapons were blamed as being the culprit of an “invisible threat” faced by the Moscow Signal; a microwave transmission varying between 2.5 – 4 Ghz, recorded at only 5 microwatts per square centimetre. It was determined to be emitted by a Soviet apartment 100 metres away, and theorised to have been used to remotely trigger eavesdropping technology or for electronic jamming purposes (disabling US monitoring equipment), but subsequent testing apparently proved inconclusive. Others proposed it was intended to interfere with the health of the US embassy staff, and more paranoid sounding theories alluded to a mind control technique. The US military’s still largely classified Project Bizarre was launched in 1965 as part of DARPA’s Project Pandora, a follow up to MKUltra (the CIA’s mind control program), with a stated purpose of analysing the Moscow Signal. According to Ken L. Wheeler, a researcher of field theory and author of The Missing Secrets of Magnetism, these studies concluded that via upper-side or lower-side band microwave frequency manipulation, prolonged exposure could induce five negative emotional states: fear, anger, confusion, lethargy, and sadness. The US embassy in Moscow was fitted with electromagnetic protection by 1976, including wire-mesh “mosquito screens” placed on the windows. Another strange incident was reported more recently in 2017 by US embassy staff in Cuba, who claimed to have experienced a weird noise described differently as “grinding metal” or “loud ringing,” leading to symptoms of headaches, memory loss, mental daze, and deafness. Cuba was accused by the Trump regime of using sonic weapons against US diplomats, and over the following months more than 80 members of staff and their families echoed complaints of related symptoms. Scientists at the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) asserted that microwave weapons were “a main suspect” (possibly due to harmonic sympathetic resonance) but there was no evidence found for this. Despite this, Beatrice Golomb of the University of California, published a study in MIT’s journal Neural Computation, called, Diplomats’ Mystery Illness and Pulsed Radiofrequency/Microwave Radiation, which assessed pulsed radiofrequency/microwave radiation (RF/MW) exposure via the Frey effect to be the source of injury. Eventually these findings were dismissed by most scientists involved in investigating the event, identifying cricket noises and mass hysteria (aka conversion disorder) to be the cause. Conversion disorder is when fear is translated into physical symptoms and psychological contagion spreads; and fear was ramped up by circumstances, politicians, and the media. Exposure to neurotoxic pesticides was also suggested as another possibility. JAMA’s threshold for measuring brain trauma was seriously low and any attack mechanism would have had to have emitted a sound that varied by individual, only affected embassy workers, and which stalked them wherever they went. Around 50 million Americans (one in six) suffer from tinnitus – ringing in the ears. A type of phenomena that’s widely reported, taking the Taos Hum for example. The Frey effect (a perception of audible clicks, or even speech, attributed to pulsed modulated radio frequencies – and devices like the MEDUSA gun) is dismissed as a “crazy” idea by professor Kenneth Foster, the bioengineer who delineated its effects back in 1974, stating: “Any kind of exposure you could give to someone that wouldn’t burn them to a crisp would produce a sound too weak to have any effect.” A verdict supported by Bill Guy, a former professor at the University of Washington, who wrote a paper on the microwave auditory effect, saying: “There couldn’t possibly be a hazard from the sound, because the heat would get you first,” “Guy says that experiments have demonstrated that radiation at 40 microjoules per pulse per square centimeter produces sound at zero decibels, which is just barely in hearing range. To produce sound at 60 decibels, or the sound of normal conversation, requires 40 watts per square centimeter of radiation. ‘That would kill you pretty fast,’ Guy says. Producing an unpleasant sound, at about 120 decibels, would take 40 million W/cm2 of energy. One milliwatt per square centimeter is considered to be the safety threshold.” ”There’s a misunderstanding by the public and even some scientists about this auditory effect,” and “there couldn’t possibly be a hazard from the sound, because the heat would get you first.” – IEEE Spectrum. Ken Wheeler regards the potential abuse of beamforming technology combined with signal triangulation to make 5G a perfect weapon and trojan horse for unscrupulous rulers. Responding to requests for advice on avoidance from high-band 5G attenuation (beyond removing any related devices from the vicinity) he suggests coating exposed walls in FlyBye copper mesh, “proven to bring down radiation and attenuation of high-band 5G from 100 microvolts, with up to 70% attenuation depending on the frequency, down to 30 or less microvolts.” The whole wall doesn’t have to be covered in mesh, instead signal attenuation can be carried out, following a similar concept to fractal antennas – which receive and broadcast on a wide spectrum of frequencies, but this requires soldering and running a 12 or 14 gauge copper wire outside to be attached to a solid-copper grounding pole. The mesh conforms to a chequerboard pattern consisting of looped around G shapes. Aluminium mesh has also been proven with frequency counters to achieve a similar result. These techniques of course affect the reception of cellphones and related technologies. Trees, plants and certain types of rocks also contribute to blocking out EMF signals. The only full-proof method to blocking out all outside wireless signals is to build a Faraday cage, which works by covering an entire enclosure in a conductive material, distributing outside electrical charges so that they’re cancelled out on its inside.
While it’s sensible to remain sceptical of any reports produced by special interest groups (such as intelligence agencies) and to endeavour to replicate and prove the results of experiments, concerns surrounding experimental wireless technologies, such as 5G or the High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) – replaced by Next-Generation Radar (NEXRAD) – are warranted and violate a number of the ten principles established in the “Permissible Medical Experiments” section of the Nuremberg Code: “1) The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.” “4) The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.” “5) No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.” “6) The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.” “7) Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.” “9) During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.” “10) During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.” Not all countries have welcomed 5G, Belgium being of particular note; Brussels, the capital of the EU, deciding not to roll-out this untested technology amongst its elite population, declaring that they were not “guinea pigs.” Elsewhere, protesters have taken to cutting or burning down offending 5G masts; airing frustrations at telecommunication giants who seem to be unaccountable and posses more rights than civilians. Advanced surveillance capabilities, as well as obvious security concerns, are alone sufficient reasons to halt development of 5G, with the human right to privacy having a proven track record of being violated internationally en-masse by state intelligence services. A fundamental human right supposed to be upheld by the United Nations (UN).
The accuracy of coronavirus infection statistics and death tolls have come under increasing scrutiny. Bafflingly, health authorities across the world have been co-ordinated in altering the reporting methodologies midway through this claimed pandemic, making it impossible for independent mathematicians to make sense of the data and calculate reliable predictive models. The US Centre for Disease Control (CDC) for example (who itself owns the patents to many vaccines in a blatant conflict of interests), mandated that hospitals start ignoring underlying health conditions when recording the cause of deaths. Doctors and nurses in various countries who’ve publicly expressed outrage at being forced to misdiagnose cause of death, have noted a sudden statistical decline in the number of patients dying from heart attacks and strokes, besides the flu, pneumonia and other respiratory illnesses. Hence statistics including people who died “with” rather than “from” COVID-19, who were told they’d die anyway within the year of other underlying health problems. Enabling the media to report an inflated number of coronavirus “related” deaths and to over-exaggerate the situation. Hardly a new criticism of an international media that is now primarily derived from just two sources, the Associated Press and Reuters, and which receives over 70% of its advertising revenue from the powerful pharmaceutical lobby. An industry that has snowballed since WW2 into by far the most profitable in the world. In fact, it’s difficult to imagine a more profitable setting for Big Pharma than modern society, which experiences long life expectancies but ever increasing levels of an endless number of chronic illnesses. Mandatory treatments are one of the few avenues the for-profit medicine business model has left to substantially maximise profit margins further.
In the United Kingdom, prior to coronavirus, around 1600 people died per day on average. A number which obviously fluctuates and increases particularly between Winter to Spring. So far, since December of 2019, over 40,000 UK deaths (out of a total of around 400,000 worldwide) have been reported in relation to the coronavirus “outbreak”. It’s now the responsibility of the Office for National Statistics to determine the confirmed number of these deaths directly caused by a novel coronavirus and not other underlying conditions. Revelations have already come to light that a huge percentage of the UK deaths came from elderly care homes and were due to already vulnerable people not being able to undergo regular doctor visits and healthcare treatments. There have also been complaints about over 80s, high risk groups and others being pressured into signing “do not attempt to resuscitate” forms after formal guidance issued stated that GPs should: “proactively complete DNAR forms… in advance of a worsening spread of disease.” The excess mortality rates related to COVID-19 have as of yet avoided the huge death tolls predicted by the original estimates released from the Imperial College of London. Used as the primary justification by the Conservative Party for the UK lockdown, it projected that 500,000 deaths would be caused by coronavirus by the end of the year if no action was taken. The team behind this report, then revised its prediction to just 20,000 deaths by the end of the year – half of whom were told they’d die anyway due to underlying health issues. This revised number would make COVID-19 comparable to the annual flu. Over the 1950 – 1951 winter period there was 62,000 excess deaths related to the flu; during 1999 – 2000 there was 48,000 winter flu deaths; and between December 2014 – March 2015 there was 44,000 flu deaths. Such discrepancies, along with blatantly inflated excess mortality statistics and a lack of scientific evidence even for the existence of a novel coronavirus, let alone the accuracy of testing methods, have led to many prominent entities to question whether or not this event has been a sensational overreaction, if not an outright fraud; implying that any unexplained deaths are unrelated to a novel coronavirus. The ramifications of the government reactions to COVID-19 have undoubtedly resulted in a huge number of additional deaths, and will likely cause far more deaths than the claimed virus; worsening at least a suicide epidemic ending almost a million lives annually in the US alone. One New York doctor said that his office had recorded a year’s worth of suicides in the few months since the state initiated its lockdown. Doctors in this state also spoke out publicly accusing hospitals of killing patients due to unnecessarily putting them onto ventilators, incentivised by higher insurance payouts. Around $13,000 was granted for patients registered as suffering from COVID-19, increasing up to $39,000 should they require a ventilator. Studies compiled from the data of the millions of people reportedly infected, carried out independently by the University of Southern California (USC), Stanford University, and sources in Germany, all concluded the excess mortality rate for COVID-19 to be an average of 0.1% (at most 0.3%); again determining it to be on par with the annual flu. The recovery rate is calculated to be between 97% and 99.75%, with the majority of those infected being classified as asymptomatic. In 2017/18 the flu killed almost 80,000 in the USA, and none of these draconian measures were implemented; COVID-19 has reportedly reached around 100,000 deaths in the US so far, but due to the revised reporting methodologies adopted by the CDC, as well as hospitals receiving larger insurance payouts for listing patients as suffering from COVID-19, these figures are being dismissed as bloated even by government officials. The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment changed its tallying method amid complaints of inflated numbers. San Diego County’s supervisor also asserted that only 6 out of 194 deaths in this area were “pure, solely coronavirus deaths.” Pennsylvania removed more than 200 deaths from its coronavirus death toll as criticisms mount regarding the accuracy of the revised reporting methodologies. In Italy, one of the worst hit areas along with China, Spain and the UK, the scientific adviser to the minster of health, Professor Walter Ricciardi, revealed that: “The way in which we code deaths in our country is very generous in the sense that all the people who die in hospitals with the coronavirus are deemed to be dying of the coronavirus.” “On re-evaluation by the National Institute of Health, only 12 per cent of death certificates have shown a direct causality from coronavirus, while 88 per cent of patients who have died have at least one pre-morbidity – many had two or three.” Del Bigtree, host of The HighWire and CEO of the Informed Consent Action Network (which produced the documentary Vaxxed, highlighting vaccine dangers), predicted that America will eventually reach the same verdict, reducing the current COVID-19 excess mortalities in the USA to around 12,000 people.
In the name of health and safety, societal freedoms long enjoyed in the UK have been replaced by the instigation of a totalitarian police state. Overnight, more than a third of the entire world has transformed into a prison planet. A draconian dictatorship that stipulates even how long a person may leave their compound for daily exercise. Arresting individuals sat alone or walking far from anybody else, getting apparently unessential fresh air and sunshine, two components obviously vital for maintaining good health. Social isolation is also recognised to be a significant factor in rapidly deteriorating physical and mental health, used by the CIA and others as a form of torture. Yet, as UK citizens were stalked by drones for walking alone in the countryside, and threatened with police violence simply for enacting their god given, inalienable rights, foreign travel (included from the most highly infected areas) continued to freely land into open airports, with few “social distancing” or “quarantine” measures on display anywhere. Just one of the countless contradictions any unbiased observers can’t fail to recognise. However, from a cynical “problem, reaction, solution” perspective, ready solutions to these predictably unfolding problems are only awaiting enough public demand.
Not all countries have bought into the virus hype (as of yet), and virology experts are projecting massive death tolls on the horizon. For heavily populated and armed yet largely impoverished countries, like Brazil and Mexico and parts of Africa, the prospects of a shutdown incited concerns over a potential total breakdown of society. The United States president, Donald Trump (trained at the Jesuit run Fordham University), refrained from issuing a nation-wide stay at home order, citing civil protections in the robust United States constitution. The majority of US states however imposed these restrictions for themselves, with eight of the expected freedom loving republican heartlands holding out (Arkansas, Iowa, North and South Dakota, Oklahoma, Nebraska, Utah and Wyoming). Protests beginning with armed patriots in Michigan and Ohio, frustrated by the erosion of basic civil liberties, then spread all over the world. After a filmed incident of police brutality involving a white police officer killing a black man named George Floyd aired across an outraged America, tensions in the country hit boiling point and it became the first Western nation to experience a wide-scale societal breakdown. Sparking mass protests and rioting, undoubtedly fuelled by the frustration of months stuck under lock-down and over 40 million new unemployment cases arising due to the US government’s response to COVID-19. This aspect to the protests has been mostly ignored by the mainstream media and establishment politicians, keen to deflect anger towards them in any other direction and to co-opt it into divisive “identity politics.” Not sincerely interested in tackling lingering racism or re-examining structural economic and class issues, the root problems actually capable of unifying society if rectified. Many deaths and injuries on both sides have now occurred, with police forces around the world obviously escalating aggressive tactics. The mass protests rapidly rendered all the measures supposedly implemented to contain the virus into a distant memory (except for the anonymising face masks). The Belarus president dismissed COVID-19 as European “psychosis” and recommended to keep healthy his citizens drink vodka (unless working) and visit the sauna twice a week. Lukashenko also accused “global elites” of making trillions by burning down the world economy. Kenyans dealt with an overzealous and heavy handed police force by evicting violent officers from a local precinct and retaking control over their community. Similar scenes erupted in India and China, where medics draped head-to-toe in protective gear were run out of impoverished communities. In Wuhan, where the virus is claimed to have originated due to somebody eating a bat (or alternatively to have been accidentally or purposefully leaked from a bio-research laboratory), residents hung out of windows yelling to television cameras that it’s all a hoax. Tanzania’s president John Magufuli made a mockery of the COVID-19 test kits by sending biological samples obtained from a goat and papaya, both of which tested positive. Multiple Italian politicians have spoken out in parliament about bloated excess mortality statistics, with one referencing attempts to impose a mandatory vaccine and “vaccine passport” control grid agenda. An intentional conspiracy or not, this international lockdown scenario presents the perfect excuse for despots to seize power, over largely defenceless populaces, many of whom would prefer to face the risks of coronavirus over ruthless authorities. Hungary’s Prime Minister, Victor Orbán, implemented an even stronger power grab than the rest of Europe’s leaders, passing an “omnipotence” law, allowing him to permanently bypass parliamentary approval in the adoption of new policies. Orbán’s popularity however remains substantial, and it could even significantly grow after pulling off a move that will have socialists across the world salivating, nationalising the energy and healthcare industry (of which 140 related companies were already monitored by military “task forces”). Indeed, Spain has taken the lead in preventing further public unrest by proposing a Basic Income Scheme, that its government intends would be introduced as a permanent feature of its economy. Other liberal leaders and even conservatives are following suit in showing support, but at this point it’s merely prescribing a bandage to hold together a body of severed limbs. Sweden is the only European country that decided not to lockdown, with all of its social services and industry carrying on as usual. The country’s health professionals espoused a “herd immunity” approach, confident in the preparedness of Swedish hospitals to cope with any sharp rises in patients, only isolating and providing extra care for those in a higher risk category. A strategy initially pursued by some Tory think-tanks, with the UK’s Prime Minister, Boris Johnson, initially unequivocally stating that most people who get COVID-19 will only experience mild to moderate symptoms; except he himself then purportedly contracted the virus… and landed up in an intensive care unit (ICU). Suffering a worse fate than several other key political and aristocratic figures; not least of all, Prince Charles, the UK’s foreign secretary Dominic Raab, and its health minister, Nadine Dorries. As well as the Tory’s media spin-doctor, Dominic Cummings, who was seen running out of Number 10 Downing Street, off to “self-isolate” at home after showing coronavirus symptoms. A member of the SAGE committee who decided on the lockdown rules, he was later savaged by the public after seeming to break these rules by travelling to a second-home in Durham, and being seen sat on a bench outside Barnard Castle. Neil Ferguson, who headed the Imperial College London’s research team that advised the UK to lockdown, was also caught “breaking lockdown rules to meet his married lover.” Other MPs and political leaders were also caught flouting the rules their parties imposed onto everybody else. Scotland’s chief medical officer Catherine Calderwood was forced to resign for travelling to her second home. The Austrian and Polish presidents both issued apologies for ignoring their rules. And Canadian president Justin Trudeau (trained at the formerly Jesuit run Collège Jean-de-Brébeuf) evaded questions about travelling to his family’s lakeside retreat. The Jesuit trained French president Emmanuel Macron (the apparent nemesis of Jesuit trained Donald Trump across the pond) and other world leaders have chimed in with war-time rhetoric: “We are at war!” Macron declared, as he mobilised the French military onto French streets, tightening the lockdown’s grip; Germany’s Merkel warns that “Coronavirus is greatest challenge since World War 2”; Canada’s Trudeau has actually enacted emergency wartime acts, as has Trump, declaring himself a “wartime president,”, with the South Korean president following suit… waging “war” against coronavirus.
Russia’s head of coronavirus information Dr Alexander Myasnikov on May 26th during an interview seemingly thought the camera had been turned off and was caught saying: “It’s all bullshit…It’s all exaggerated. It’s an acute respiratory disease with minimal mortality…Why has the whole world been destroyed? That I don’t know.” A leaked email published by the Danish newspaper Politiken, revealed that the Danish Healthy Authority disagree with the government’s approach, and similar to the case with the SAGE (Scientific Advisor Group for Emergencies) advisors to the UK government, politicians were accused of pressuring scientists into overstating the dangers posed to the general public, with civil servants holding back vital information until after lockdown periods were extended. “The Danish Health Authority continues to consider that covid-19 cannot be described as a generally dangerous disease, as it does not have either a usually serious course or a high mortality rate.” The Danish parliament on March 12th then passed an emergency law demoting the health authority from a “regulatory authority” to an “advisory authority,” reducing its power while implementing other related changes. On May 9th a report commissioned by Germany’s department of the interior, Analysis of the Crisis Management, was leaked to the magazine Tichys Einblick after its findings were ignored, concluding: “The dangerousness of Covid-19 was overestimated: probably at no point did the danger posed by the new virus go beyond the normal level.” “The danger is obviously no greater than that of many other viruses. There is no evidence that this was more than a false alarm.” “During the Corona crisis the State has proved itself as one of the biggest producers of Fake News.”
It’s known that wealthy hedge fund traders, some linked to the Tory party and Brexit organisers – such as Dominic Cummings, have huge shorts waged against the UK economy, meaning they stand to gain a fortune from any collapse of the UK economy, the worse the better for them financially. And despite being ranked as the second best prepared country in the world for a pandemic (second to the US) by the John Hopkins Center for Health Security’s Global Health Security Index, it is now forecast by the Organisation for Economic Development (OECD) to become the worst hit economy in the developed world, predicting a drop of 11.5% in its GDP for 2020, that was admitted could end up much worse. The Office for National Statistics (ONS) reports that the UK economy has already shrunk 30.8% from February to the end of April. The Conservatives have made no mention of how they plan to recover all the money spent on paying out months worth of furlough payments, covering 80% of business earnings and staff wages (including for the self-employed), but being as it’s the Tories, the working class can rest assured that they’ll be planning to drop the burden squarely onto their backs and that of their children, with a long future of hard austerity planned ahead. The magic money tree used to enrich all variety of useless endeavours will vanish overnight once again. As is customary with any economic crisis, there have been many accusations of insider trading relating to policy makers, with some companies set to gain huge profits, through developing vaccines and lockdown related products. On top of the piles of crisis stacked backs are a handful of individual CEOs poised to become the world’s first openly recognised trillionaires.
In all of their unrivalled wisdom, multiple governments have somehow unanimously decided that food is no longer an “essential” item. Canada’s president Justin Trudeau initially didn’t bother including any sort of agriculture on its key essential services, despite alcohol off-licenses being given such priority. Apparently, according to modern leaderships, growing food is no longer an “essential” service, and the agriculture industry is already collapsing as a result, with garden centres, plant nurseries, and entire allotments and farms made to close down. This unbelievable short sightedness has hit states in the US (like Vermont) and other countries policies, specifically marking seeds as “non-essential” items. At a time when food shortages have already begun ravaging the poor, with riots breaking out daily at supermarkets public interest in growing food is at a recent all time high, with many intuitively worried about food shortages and desperately attempting to rekindle self-sustainability. Supermarkets are of course deemed to be an essential service, though quite why the private multi-nationals in charge of essential utilities are the only ones still allowed to generate a living – and a huge profit from this crisis – is a question that demands answering. As well as where governments plan in the future to source from.
One would imagine that a leadership concerned about its civilians would be more than ever encouraging the planting of food, but predictably, this situations reveals the shortcomings of a world run at the behest of crony capitalism. There has been relatively little resources allocated to ensuring the integrity and sustainability of food distribution networks and supply chains, with many farmers reporting that they’ve been forced to abandon crops and kill off livestocks. Potentially meaning there could be significant food shortages in the near future and an unhealthy dependence on centralised sources. Responsibility for any resulting famines has to fall on elected governments, but responses have been largely co-ordinated behind the scenes by UN’s World Health Organisation (WHO). A “specialised agency,” headquartered in Geneva, Switzerland, that again has a major conflict of interests as a heavy investor in the vaccine industry. The WHO is now predominantly funded by the Microsoft entrepreneur Bill Gates. Its biggest donors prior to this event were the US government, followed the UK government, but Donald Trump decided recently to withdraw US funding, after threatening to do so for a number of years. Already, 135 million people are reported to be experiencing acute food shortages, and the chief economist of the UN’s World Food Program, Arif Husain, estimates that in total 130 million people could die of starvation in the year 2020.
The end game of coronavirus, or any contagious pandemic, is hailed to be “herd immunity”; and this is the justification presented for vaccines, said to contain a small dose of the infectious viral agent within them. However, the efficacy of vaccines is a highly debated and contentious issue. Those that advocate a natural approach to health rely upon maintaining a strong immune system, via a healthy diet and lifestyle, and keeping their bodies and environments from being overloaded by toxins and dangerous radiation. This god-given way of life and herd immunity is now under threat of becoming illegal the world over. Replaced by unquestionable man-made laws drawn up by outright ex-Nazi eugenicists such as the pharmaceutical giant Merck. Glorifying the same scientific authorities who struggle anymore simply to define the biological differences between men and women. Already lawmakers in Denmark have jumped on the coronavirus opportunity to impose mandatory vaccinations on its civilians, for a vaccine which presumably doesn’t exist yet and that nobody has had the chance to ascertain the safety implications of; a vaccine which is being rushed through at record speed, bypassing any lengthy due diligence whatsoever. Yet again violating the Nuremberg Code and precautionary principle, despite the latter being the excuse used for shutting down a third of the world over a claimed virus with an excess mortality rate statistically comparable to a bad flu season. Sticking to empirical science, there has never actually been any large scale clinical trials conducted comparing the health differences between vaccinated and unvaccinated people; lending substantial credence to vaccine objections. This is an area in which more light could easily be shed on if the health insurance companies released their historical data (assuming it was accurate); helping to show for example whether or not a vaccine might assist with one condition but also lead to other diseases, like cancer (now experienced by 1 out of 2 people born after 1960 in the UK). Such information isn’t forthcoming, from an industry that stands to profit from positive figures, hinting that the data does not support Big Pharma’s cause. It’s disputed that there’s any irrefutable proof that a vaccine has ever been responsible for eliminating any disease (including smallpox). Admittedly many vaccines today still contain toxic metals like aluminium and mercury; which are now proven to cross the blood-brain barrier, potentially contributing to rising rates of neurological diseases like dementia and Alzheimer’s, amongst other illnesses, many of which were previously almost unheard of. Many vaccines also contain genetic materials from dead matter, including tissue from aborted baby fetuses and other species of animals. Stanley Plotkin, considered to be a leading expert in the vaccine industry, underwent a 9+ hour voluntary inquisition, which led to a revealing insider expose highlighting many of these issues. He defiantly said he’d continue to definitively assert to his patients that “vaccines do not cause autism,” despite acknowledging the Industry of Medicine’s (IOM) conclusion that there were no clinical studies to support this view either way, and the numerous anecdotal claims from parents that vaccines caused autism in their children. Curiously, there was a steep decline in infant mortalities during the lockdown, a period vaccination rates dropped off significantly, most specifically relating to Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SID). Big Pharma is legally protected like no other industry on earth from individual lawsuits due to its malpractice and incompetence, though it regularly settles billions in out-of-court fines for outright criminal conduct, including fraud, bribery, racketeering, and illegal scandals resulting in other lawsuits. In 2013 the US Supreme Court ruled that any drugs approved by the FDA cannot result in lawsuits against pharmaceutical companies, even by individuals proven to have been injured by these drugs. Six out of the top ten pharmaceutical companies are based in the USA: Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Merck, Gilead, Amgen, and AbbVie; the other four being Roche and Novartis in Switzerland, Sanofi in France, and GlaxoSmithKline in the UK. From 1991 – 2015 the pharmaceutical industry paid out a total of $35.7 billion in fines. A small price to pay in a market that’s worth annually over $1 trillion dollars. Those who sit on regulatory bodies usually have a history of working within the pharmaceutical industry. So it’s a circular and self-perpetuating system, that effectively results in self-regulation, which in reality is providing no regulation. The punishment for dissenters who refuse vaccines is hypothetically indefinite jail sentences in solitary confinement or enforced medication, but quite why vaccinated people should be so frightened of the unvaccinated is fraught full of fallacious reasoning and contrived science, related to a faulty concept of “herd immunity.” No matter how sophisticated modern medicine acts, there is no cure for the common flu (aka coronavirus), except for a preventative healthy living and sanitary environment.
This health epidemic crisis sets the stage for a world-wide economic crash, and a digital revolution – now deemed by Microsoft’s Bill Gates to be an absolute necessity. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation in the lead up to the coronavirus crisis has pivoted into becoming the WHO’s biggest donor. For a number of years now Bill Gates has been busily promoting the vaccination of everybody on Earth. During this COVID-19 epidemic he’s upped the ante further by sharing his vision for “digital immunity” certificates, presumably aided by human microchipping or some type of branding or “tattoo” using invisible ink, intended as a form of worldwide surveillance under the auspices of “disease tracking.” Used as an identification “marker” to monitor those who have or have had particular viruses (and perhaps developed protective anti-bodies), or taken vaccines against them. Required as a passport to move around the world, so as to not “completely block off” foreign travel, especially to regions not rated by the WHO or whoever else as not having viral epidemics under sufficient “control.” Only six weeks prior to the coronavirus outbreak, the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation partnered with the World Economic Forum (WEF) in running a virus pandemic simulation, Event 201, hosted by the John Hopkins Centre. Its content was designed to engage and educate its participants and audience. It emphasised the role of “fake news” emanating from the internet, the last bastion of free speech that has immediately faced extra censorship on the back of the COVID-19 situation, despite many of its biggest social networks being hosted in Silicon Valley, under the protection of America’s 1st amendment. In January at Davos (a mountain resort in the Swiss Alps) the WEF hold an annual 5-day event consisting of 500 public and private sessions; gathering around 3,000 business leaders, international political leaders, economists, celebrities and journalists. Gates shares the sentiment of the Australian Prime Minister, as well as that of the US of Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Dr Anthony Fauci, and the Italian and Thai health officials, who all claim that society won’t return to normal until there’s a vaccine available for coronavirus; the latter two demanding some type of “COVID-19 Pass” as a “marker of immunity.” Rousing apocalyptic prophecies of the mark of the beast, without which no honest person would any longer be able to live peacefully and conduct trade. Of course such allegorical texts do not refer directly to technology (as seems to be a common misconception) but rather adherence to a corrupt system. Yet lo and behold, Microsoft has also filed a patent numbered #W02020060606, proposing to transform the human body into a cryptocurrency mining machine by recording its unique activity and awarding credits to users if they satisfy “one or more conditions set by the cryptocurrency system.” UNICEF now encourages block-chain and cryptocurrency projects as part of its “sustainable development goals,” which include digital ID systems such as ID2020 launched in 2018 in partnership with UNHCR, and COVI-PASS, a secure Digital Health Passport that displays COVID-19 test histories, as well as “immunoresponse and other relevant health information…In order to safely return to work and social interactions.” Technology already being utilised for ledgers used to track refugees and food supply chains. MIT announced it has produced a method of storing biomedical data under the skin, able to be read by smartphones, that can be inserted alongside a vaccine using “quantum dot dye” and a micro-needle patch. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has also invested in the US firm MicroCHIPS, which is developing a contraceptive microchip implant that engineers a controlled-release of a birth control hormone on demand; turning on and off women’s reproductive systems at the flick of a switch. A US company called Bichip made the first and only currently available “distance readable human microchip with internet connectivity,” functioning as an ID and usable for purchases and such activity by being integrated with a cryptocurrency wallet; storing medical data, drivers licenses and passport details. The FIDO Alliance is the main open-source provider of biometric solutions and other technology security standards capable of replacing passwords. A transition that has already arrived with fingerprint readers, iris scanners, voice analysers, and facial recognition in-built on new high-end mobiles and laptops. Human verification has benefits and is convenient but gets severely compromised by surveillance issues. The FIDO specifications were implemented as the international standard by the United Nations International Telecommunications Union (ITU). Originally launching its project in 2012, the same year that ITU began its “IMT for 2020 and beyond” initiative, encompassing the world’s 5G roll-out. In 2015 at the ITU’s 150th anniversary celebration, Bill Gates was presented with an award, and his speech evangelised the possibilities of extending digital financial services to the third world; reaching the planet’s 2.5 billion unbanked population, who will also need vaccinated and tracked. This January the WEF published its white paper “The Impact of 5G: Creating New Value across Industries and Society”, endorsing through enhanced connectivity the potential of the “Internet of Things (IoT), Artificial Intelligence (AI), advanced data analytics, robotic process automation, robotics, cloud computing, virtual and augmented reality, 3d printing and drones.” On June 3rd the WEF went public with a transhumanism agenda that even discussed future protections for “freedom of thought” necessitated by supposed advancements in brainwave reading technologies; dubbing it the “great reset of capitalism,” they conceived COVID-19 was “our best chance to instigate stakeholder capitalism.” This “fourth industrial revolution” paves the way for a technocratic Chinese style credit system designed as a state surveillance and control grid, with the ultimate purpose of breeding servile citizens. Starting as voluntary, it quickly began severely limiting access to essential public services for those who refused to participate and soon enough officially became mandatory. Many fearing compulsory vaccinations would coerce utilising similar bribery and blackmailing methods; as is already the case in countries like Italy where vaccines are mandatory for children sent to state schools. This revolution has so far seen the richest in the world dramatically increase their fortunes, while the rest go broke. Amazon CEO, Jeff Bezos, has reportedly amassed another $34 billion dollars during this pandemic. According to the Institute for Policy Study, America’s billionaires alone have amassed an extra $565 billion, while its public forked out $6 trillion of its taxes towards funding COVID-19 related initiatives, run largely by private companies. The UK’s billionaires have gained another £25 billion during the lockdown so far. All culminating in a huge wealth transfer from the working and middle class 99% to the top 1%. In a scenario rightly being called out as an asset stripping operation.
It’s interesting to discover that in 2017 the Jesuit educated Dr Anthony Fauci predicted a “surprise outbreak” for the next US administration in regards to “pandemic preparedness.” Emphasising the message at a speech to a Jesuit conference hosted by Georgetown University’s Center for Global Health Science and Security, and Harvard University’s Global Health Institute. Dr Fauci has been involved in five US administrations since assuming office on November 2 1984, during Ronald Reagan’s era. Both George Bush and Obama too warned of pandemics, the latter in 2014 predicting a flu outbreak for 2019. Donald Trump also in 2017 was quoted in a press conference with top military leaders as saying: “Do you know what this represents? Maybe it’s the calm before the storm.” Journalists took this as a cryptic allusion to a future a war but it has been suggested he was perhaps referencing Dr Fauci’s prediction. Trump, was at this time threatening to leave the UN and withdraw funding from the WHO. After gaining a large portion of his political uprise pandering to “conspiracy theories,” according to Bill Gates, Trump planned to launch an investigation into vaccine dangers, but he persuaded him not to, saying “that’s a dead end, don’t do that.” Trump was following the advice of the Jesuit educated anti-hero Robert F Kennedy Jr (obviously a nephew of president John F Kennedy), who has been outspoken about the dangers of vaccines and was to head up the vaccine commission. Last week he made a scathing attack on Gates “philanthropic” ambitions to control a vaccination ID enterprise and world-wide health policy, condemning his obsession with vaccines “fuelled by a conviction to save the world with technology.” Exposing historical vaccination programs with Bill Gates involvement, starting with a polio vaccine in India, administrated after he was put in charge of the country’s National Technical Advisory Group on Immunization (NTAGI) “which mandated up to 50 doses (Table 1) of polio vaccines through overlapping immunization programs to children before the age of five. Indian doctors blame the Gates campaign for a devastating non-polio acute flaccid paralysis (NPAFP) epidemic that paralyzed 490,000 children beyond expected rates between 2000 and 2017. In 2017, the Indian government dialed back Gates’ vaccine regimen and asked Gates and his vaccine policies to leave India. NPAFP rates dropped precipitously.” “In 2017, the World Health Organization (WHO) reluctantly admitted that the global explosion in polio is predominantly vaccine strain. The most frightening epidemics in Congo, Afghanistan, and the Philippines, are all linked to vaccines. In fact, by 2018, 70% of global polio cases were vaccine strain.” “In 2009, the Gates Foundation funded tests of experimental HPV vaccines, developed by Glaxo Smith Kline (GSK) and Merck, on 23,000 young girls in remote Indian provinces. Approximately 1,200 suffered severe side effects, including autoimmune and fertility disorders. Seven died. Indian government investigations charged that Gates-funded researchers committed pervasive ethical violations: pressuring vulnerable village girls into the trial, bullying parents, forging consent forms, and refusing medical care to the injured girls. The case is now in the country’s Supreme Court.” “In 2010, the Gates Foundation funded a phase 3 trial of GSK’s experimental malaria vaccine, killing 151 African infants and causing serious adverse effects, including paralysis, seizure, and febrile convulsions, to 1,048 of the 5,949 children.” “During Gates’ 2002 MenAfriVac campaign in Sub-Saharan Africa, Gates’ operatives forcibly vaccinated thousands of African children against meningitis. Approximately 50 of the 500 children vaccinated developed paralysis. South African newspapers complained, “We are guinea pigs for the drug makers.” Nelson Mandela’s former senior economist, Professor Patrick Bond, describes Gates’ philanthropic practices as “ruthless and immoral.” “A 2017 study (Morgenson et. al. 2017) showed that WHO’s popular DTP vaccine is killing more African children than the diseases it prevents. DTP-vaccinated girls suffered 10x the death rate of children who had not yet received the vaccine. WHO has refused to recall the lethal vaccine, which it forces upon tens of millions of African children annually.” “Global public health advocates around the world accuse Gates of steering WHO’s agenda away from the projects that are proven to curb infectious diseases: clean water, hygiene, nutrition, and economic development. The Gates Foundation spends only about $650 million of its $5 billion dollar budget on these areas. They say he has diverted agency resources to serve his personal philosophy that good health only comes in a syringe.” “In addition to using his philanthropy to control WHO, UNICEF, GAVI, and PATH, Gates funds a private pharmaceutical company that manufactures vaccines and is donating $50 million to 12 pharmaceutical companies to speed up development of a coronavirus vaccine. In his recent media appearances, Gates appears confident that the Covid-19 crisis will now give him the opportunity to force his dictatorial vaccine programs on all American children – and adults.”
A “conspiracy theory” has been promulgated by Donald Trump and some of his staff that this virus was a bio-weapon released either accidentality or deliberately from a bio-research facility in Wuhan, the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV). It surprisingly has funding links to Dr Fauci, relating to research into the future risks of the emergence of coronavirus from bats… himself spending years at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) studying bioterrorism. The NIH gave a $3.4 million grant in 2014 to the US based EcoHealth, pre-approving the distribution of $600,000 to WIV, its project collaborator. On the other hand, in China, Iran and Russia the main culprit blamed for its release is the US military. One of the most revealing takeaways from these accusations is how Google and other search engines are managing public perceptions on behalf of all these governments (as well as other outright totalitarian regimes) by skewing results to bolster perceived bad guys according to region. The psychological operations entailed in a media managed pandemic was the focus of Event 201, heavily critical of online “misinformation” and “disinformation” spread during its simulation, while advocating for much stricter government censorship to combat “dangerous” influences. The fact that the tests being deployed to detect this claimed new viral disease are completely incapable of such a task, urgently prompts the question of how much of this event is a psychological operation (PSYOP). From an objective scientific perspective, going by virologists own gold standard testing, and the view of the creator of PCR tests, there is no empirical proof that a novel mutation of coronavirus even exists. If 6 million people have been made sick and 400,000 are dead due to something outwith normal circumstances then those in charge have systematically failed to carry out any proper investigation into ascertaining the true cause, pointing towards either a cover up or incompetent negligence on a world-wide scale. A test that is looking for something that is present within 100% of human beings proves absolutely nothing, and has a 0% accuracy rate. Back in 2015, investigative journalist Harry Vox claimed that viruses were a tool used by governments to impose martial law and control grids. Predicting during the Western African Ebola epidemic (2013 – 2016) that in the near future quarantines and curfews would be instated in the US due to a virus situation, and exploited to erode civil liberties and build a “prison planet.” Citing a document called “Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development”, drafted in 2010 by the Research Unit at the Rockefeller Foundation, which presented its focal question as being: “How might technology affect barriers to building resilience and equitable growth in the developing world over the next 15 to 20 years?” Describing economic and governance focused “scenario narratives,” created by analysing “factors likely to affect a particular set of challenges and opportunities.” Vox (who’d put the most likely blame for the crisis at the door of the Israeli Secret Intelligence Service (ISIS)) also spoke of the CIA’s collaboration with non-governmental organisation (NGO) think-tanks, and its infiltration and subversion of the US public’s free press, beginning with Project Mockingbird. The “scenario narrative” society has currently ended up in is defined as: “Lock Step: A world of tighter top-down government control and more authoritarian leadership, with limited innovation and growing citizen pushback.” The other three outlined scenario narratives predicted to play out in the future are: “Clever Together: A world in which highly coordinated and successful strategies emerge for addressing both urgent and entrenched worldwide issues”; “Hack Attack: An economically unstable and shock-prone world in which governments weaken, criminals thrive, and dangerous innovations emerge”; “Smart Scramble: An economically depressed world in which individuals and communities develop localized, makeshift solutions to a growing set of problems.”
Bill Gates isn’t a doctor or an elected representative (nor is the WHO) but as one of the world’s richest people he feels entitled enoguh to dictate the health regimes of the entire world. His TED talk raised eyebrows by adding vaccines to his list of tools for population reduction, an ambition framed as helping with climate change. He has since justified this stance by claiming that vaccinations improve children’s health and therefore stop families needing to have so many. A pro-eugenics attitude may not be surprising when studying his family history. His mother, who despite being anti-apartheid and it being long after the fact, was a board member for IBM, which directly did business with the Nazi regime, and was the company Bill partnered with to license Microsoft’s source code for personal computers. His father, Bill Gates Senior, is an attorney who was president of the Seattle/King County Bar Association and Washington State Bar Association, and founder of the Technology Alliance. He once served as a Planned Parenthood board member, which is lambasted for performing late-term and even partial-birth abortions. He’s pictured alongside George Soros, David Rockefeller, and Ted Turner – the CNN founder, who equivocated: “A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal.” Half the population deemed ideal by the Georgia Guide Stones (erected by a secret society), which reached their 40th anniversary this year on March 22nd; the day before the UK went into lockdown.
These scientific authorities that appear to have usurped democratically elected governments and been allowed to impose an effective martial law under the guise of quarantines, are the same scientific authorities pushing the transgender agenda, sneakily using policy capture and entryism to subvert political organisations. Backed up by coercive control and compelled speech, trying to force reality denying and anti-scientific dogma onto biology acknowledging societies and individuals. Unable to convince the vast majority of adults of their propaganda, NGO’s (non-governmental organisations) have deliberately targetted their children by infiltrating education curriculums from nursery schools upwards. Since UK schools began confusing gender non-conformity with gender dysphoria an increase of 5,337% of girls have been referred to the Tavistock clinic; 35% of the children being autistic, without any protections. A provable form of social-contagion. The law firm Dentons, on behalf of the Thomson Reuters Foundation, the LGBT pressure group IGLYO, and another unnamed entity, went as far as drafting legal legislation that proposed a framework to remove children from uncooperative parents opposed to them undergoing damaging “gender-reassignment.” The WHO on May 25th 2019 reclassified “gender identity disorder” as “gender incongruence” and started including it in its chapter on sexual health. Advising that sex education programs in Europe teach children aged four and under about “early childhood masturbation” and the “right to explore gender identities.” After advising countries to herd all their citizens into their home, the WHO’s Executive Directer of the Health Emergencies Program, Dr Michael Ryan, terrified concerned listeners by suggesting that health services should be going door to door to “remove” those likely infected into “dignified isolation,” again involving forcibly removing children from parents. If COVID-19 is as contagious as the WHO says, then it’s inevitable that everyone within an infected household will rapidly become infected or be immune, so such proposals are not only extremist but entirely unpractical, yet nonetheless are being put forward by these influential (though unelected) policy makers. Rather than following science the WHO only seems interested in political power and implementing sinister agendas. Following its past director’s advice, Brock Chisolm, quoted in the SCP Journal in 1991 as saying: “To achieve world government, it is necessary to remove from the minds of men their individualism, loyalty to family traditions, national patriotism, and religious dogmas.” In one fell swoop: individual autonomy over health and risk tolerance levels has been eradicated; families, friends and communities split apart; national sovereignty annihilated; citizens divided and turned against each other – even facial expressions rendered anonymous; and all religious freedom of worship and cultural traditions have been shutdown and subdued.
The search for a vaccine cure for the common cold (aka, coronavirus) is hardly new, but it has for a long time been unsuccessful, and many would argue that it always will be. How exactly all the political and pharmaceutical industry proponents of shutting down the world until a vaccine is available can guarantee that it will be on the market in any reasonable amount of time is highly suspicious to say the least. Vaccines usually many take years to develop and to safety test, and for many diseases have been totally unable to be produced ever – as is the case with coronavirus. How a vaccine can be developed for a novel coronavirus mutation that hasn’t yet properly been proven to exist is another mind boggling question. All the same, numerous potential vaccines have somehow already been developed for COVID-19 during the past few months, with Donald Trump promising a vaccine will be ready by the end of the year in his announcement of “Operation Warp Speed”. Those fastest out of the gates and already undertaking human trials has been Moderna, Pfizer and its German partner BioNTech, the Chinese CanSino, and an Oxford and Astrazeneca collaboration. China in its “race against Trump” is already planning to roll-out its vaccine before its human trials are even finished, while the University of Oxford is hopeful to be ready to go by September. The US biotechnology company Inovio claimed within 2 hours it already had a coronavirus vaccine available. It has also partnered with the International Vaccine Institute (IVI) and Seoul National University to already start rolling out human clinical trials in South Korea, funded by a $6.9 million grant from the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI). Back in January 24th Inovio received a $9 million grant from (CEPI) to develop a vaccine for COVID-19. CEPI was founded in Davos by the Norwegian and Indian governments, the WEF, the Wellcome Trust, and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Funded by an initial investment of $460 million from the German, Japanese, and Norwegian governments. The CEO of CEPI, Richard Hatchett, was the former director of the US Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), a part of the US Department of Health & Human Services (HHS). Inovio is run by David Weiner and Dr Joseph Kim; the latter, once funded by Merck, is an ex-member of the WEF Global Agenda Council – a major player in the UN’s 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, brought forward as Agenda 2021.
On the subject of the benefits of lockdowns, there isn’t even consensus amongst the mainstream scientists who do believe there to be a new strain of coronavirus sweeping the world. The lauded “herd immunity” is regarded by most to be the only viable remedy, in which case a lockdown is regarded by some to be the worst possible action to take, only giving hospitals time to prepare; and those developing a miracle vaccine… which would usually take years to ascertain the safety of and possibly never arrive in any kind of satisfactory manner – in either case killing more than the virus itself due to the lockdown consequences. A lockdown is argued to be the worst possible response to take because the virus would then occur in waves, and instead of spreading through the healthy majority of people largely unaffected, who’d then develop apparent “herd immunity” (by which time it’s deemed to be panic over), the virus is able to slowly pick off the sickest and most vulnerable amongst us. As it’s alleged that without developing herd immunity, the immune system of the whole pack grows weaker and more susceptible to viral mutations. Stuck in repeated lockdowns for prolonged periods that could be instigated by unelected health authorities at any moment. While those who went through the initial pain of developing herd immunity are free to recommence normal life again. Not “flattening the curve,” but rather “broadening the curve.”
China, whose authoritarian response was predicted in the 2010 Rockefeller document, and Event 201, to be a highly efficient model, has now also been praised by the WHO. But after already ending its lockdown with businesses back up and running, it’s already enacting its second lockdown. Europe is slowly lifting its restrictions and retreating back a herd immunity approach, amidst talk of returning society in waves; first allowing the “immune” back to the workplaces and then the healthy, gradually widening services. The final solution is promoted as being mass surveillance under the guise of contact tracing, involving tracking everybody and notifying them if they come into contact with someone testing positive for COVID-19. Entailing huge privacy implications, even with any claims of anonymity, with a UK contract for the application involving Dominic Cummings’ Vote Leave data-mining friends Faculty Science Ltd (formerly ASI Data Science and Advanced Skills Initiative Ltd), an artificial intelligence provider, intimately involved in modelling the research to “configure” and “optimise” the NHSX app. ASI was tied to Cambridge Analytica, who were infamously caught exploiting private data. Its founder is Marc Warner graduated from Harvard and the London Centre for Nanotechnology. Another contract went to Palantir, a data-mining juggernaut funded by the CIA. Anyone who comes into contact with somebody who tests positive is to be contacted and told to self-isolate for 14 days. Those travelling on public transport or returning to any sort of busy social life is almost guaranteed to hit this criteria on a regular basis. Even if you only have ten friends, they also have ten friends, who also have ten friends, and so on, so you’re still only two handshakes away from a thousand people at any one time. An absurd response to a virus with a survival rate comparable to the annual flu. It’s a situation that is at the very least being blatantly exploited by a ruling class desperate to take control over every aspect of human life. Norway’s health authorities have already ditched the country’s COVID-19 tracking app Smittestopp (“Infection Stop”), developed by the Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH), and have deleted all of its collected location data, after criticism from Norway’s Data Protection Authority (DPA). An economy can’t just be paused and restarted. The Black market alone accounts for an estimated 2 trillion dollars, encompassing countless workers who don’t file tax returns but up until now haven’t been reliant on state welfare. A safety net immensely strained processing record numbers of new applicants, and dependent upon a financial structure itself needing re-balanced to remain sustainable – if not a long awaited “great reset.” In Italy (where over 3 million work off the books) mob bosses are handing out food to crisis hit neighbourhoods, launching a charm offensive and recruitment drive. This event is for sure a game changer, sparking an international revolution. A technocratic world divided into “essential workers” and a perpetually terrified “economically unviable” reliant on state handouts is meant to be the “new normal.” A rapidly devolving “new abnormal,” germinating deeper disparity, depression, criminality, and authoritarianism, collectively allowed to fester. History hopefully shows that strife unites the masses. This surely means not submitting to an ideology of fear and insisting on bringing to life a positive vision of the future. Naturally built around love and social equality, as well as individual freedoms. Guided by the golden rule and the human immunity of critical thought and accountability.
Last edited 27.02.21